I spent a significant amount of my life in a part of Appalachia where many young people thought a “career path” was qualifying for Social Security Disability and getting food stamps so they could do whatever they wanted at tax payer expense. Hard to believe the New York Times noticed it. In the book “The Man Who Moved A Mountain”, about the mountaineers of Virginia in the early 1900’s the New York media called for the extermination of the mountaineers if they wouldn’t behave “just like the Red Indians”. So I suppose this is an improvement for the fate of Appalachians… they have been seduced by the welfare state instead of being eliminated altogether, but neither was what God intended.
Nicholas D. Kristof writes at the New York Times:
This is painful for a liberal to admit, but conservatives have a point when they suggest that America’s safety net can sometimes entangle people in a soul-crushing dependency. Our poverty programs do rescue many people, but other times they backfire.
Some young people [in Appalachia] don’t join the military (a traditional escape route for poor, rural Americans) because it’s easier to rely on food stamps and disability payments.
Antipoverty programs also discourage marriage: In a means-tested program like S.S.I., a woman raising a child may receive a bigger check if she refrains from marrying that hard-working guy she likes. Yet marriage is one of the best forces to blunt poverty. In married couple households only one child in 10 grows up in poverty, while almost half do in single-mother households.
Most wrenching of all are the parents who think it’s best…
View original post 169 more words